Editorial and Correction Policy

Editorial responsibility

Computer Science study material is written and reviewed by Pankaj Kumar, who holds MCA and B.Ed. degrees, has 12 years of software-development experience, and has worked for 5 years as a Computer Science teacher.

How topics are prepared

1. Scope: Identify the concepts, terminology, examples, and comparisons needed for the topic.
2. Verification: Check important technical claims against official documentation, standards, recognised textbooks, and examination-authority material where applicable.
3. Explanation: Rewrite concepts in clear language and add examples, tables, revision notes, and practice questions.
4. Review: Check factual accuracy, internal consistency, links, and whether the page answers the learning need promised by its title.
5. Maintenance: Review reported errors and update pages when reliable source material changes.

Sources and examination information

Technical pages cite primary standards, official documentation, or established reference books where they are useful. Examination dates, eligibility, patterns, and syllabi can change; the relevant examination authority remains the final source for current rules.

Corrections

Readers can report factual errors, broken links, unclear explanations, or outdated examination information through the Contact page. Please include the page URL, the text that appears incorrect, and—when possible—a reliable supporting source.

A reported issue is checked before publication is changed. Material corrections should result in an updated review date on the affected page.

Independence and advertising

Advertising does not determine the conclusions or explanations in study material. Sponsored content, if introduced in the future, will be clearly identified. ExamRig does not sell rankings or favourable educational coverage.